This is the car the Smart should always have been. Indeed, according to Smart’s global product manager, Pitt Moos, this is the car the Smart was originally intended to be.
Moos is claiming that the original 1998 Smart was intended to be either electric-powered or a hybrid. The Smart’s entire being — its diminutive size, its Jetsonian shape, its sparse creature comforts — literally screams green intentions. That we got diesel-and gasoline-powered versions first is a result of consumers not being ready for electrification.
Well, we are now and the Smart, despite the headline-grabbing Nissan Leaf and Chevrolet Volt, is the first production electric car available to the general public from a major manufacturer. It’s also one that, considering the limitations of the breed, makes sense. The Smart, after all, has always been an urban car.
Mercedes has an advantage over other manufacturers pimping their electric cars. The Smart is one of only two EVs — the Volt being the other — I’ve tested that meets its targeted range specifications without “special” qualifications.
Mercedes promises a 135-kilometre range and that is almost exactly the amount it would have attained. Nor, as I said, did it require all those coasting/braking/tip-toeing tricks EV manufacturers claim the public can’t wait to embrace as part of its conversion to electric cars. Half of my driving was on the highway, which is normally anathema to EV range. I can, therefore, promise that, unless you are constantly driving uphill, the Smart’s 135-km range is a practical rather than theoretical limitation.
So, yes, the fortwo electric drive is here. Yes, it is the most sensible of EVs, both in range and intended use. As a part, albeit small, of the revolution to green our roads, it makes sense. Mercedes has other options — diesels and hybrids, etc. — it sees as more viable solutions for mainstream motoring. There’s a lesson in there somewhere for other auto-makers boasting electrification.
Article source: Article Source

